Federal Grand Jury Indicts New Orleans Man for Being a Felon in Possession of a Firearm

Federal Grand Jury Indicts New Orleans Man for Felon Possessing Firearm. Teddy Nathan now faces charges with potential penalties of up to 15 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. Learn more about the case and the role of Project Safe Neighborhoods.

In a recent development, a federal grand jury has indicted a man from New Orleans for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The accused, Teddy Nathan, 24 years old, is now facing charges of possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. If convicted, Nathan could potentially face imprisonment up to 15 years, a fine of up to $250,000, supervised release for 3 years, and a mandatory special assessment fee of $100. This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program aimed at reducing violent crime and gun violence by bringing together law enforcement and communities. The investigation was carried out by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the New Orleans Police Department, and the Louisiana State Police, with prosecution led by Assistant United States Attorney David Haller.

Table of Contents

Federal Grand Jury Indicts New Orleans Man for Being a Felon in Possession of a Firearm

Overview of the case

The case involving Teddy Nathan revolves around his alleged possession of a firearm despite being a convicted felon. Teddy Nathan, a 24-year-old resident of New Orleans, Louisiana, has been charged with one count of possession of ammunition, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1). This case holds significant importance as it highlights the enforcement of federal firearm laws and the efforts made to prevent felons from possessing firearms.

Charges against Teddy Nathan

Teddy Nathan is facing a single charge of possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. The charge is based on the violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1). This federal law prohibits individuals who have been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year from possessing firearms or ammunition.

Potential penalties if convicted

If Teddy Nathan is convicted of the charges brought against him, he could face severe penalties. The maximum term of imprisonment for his offense is 15 years. Additionally, he may be required to pay a fine of up to $250,000. Upon release from imprisonment, Nathan would also be subject to a term of supervised release for up to 3 years. Lastly, a mandatory special assessment fee of $100 would be imposed.

Importance of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

In the American criminal justice system, it is crucial to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This standard ensures that a defendant is not wrongfully convicted and that their rights to a fair trial are protected. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, meaning they must present sufficient evidence to convince the jury of the defendant’s guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

Involvement of Project Safe Neighborhoods

This case is connected to Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program aimed at reducing violent crime and gun violence in communities. PSN emphasizes collaboration between law enforcement agencies and local communities to create safer neighborhoods. By implementing various strategies, such as the strengthening of enforcement priorities and supporting community-based organizations, PSN seeks to prevent violence and improve overall community safety.

Role of law enforcement agencies in the investigation

The investigation into Teddy Nathan’s case involved multiple law enforcement agencies working together. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the New Orleans Police Department, and the Louisiana State Police all played crucial roles in gathering evidence and building the case against Nathan. This collaborative effort demonstrates the commitment of these agencies to uphold federal firearm laws and ensure public safety.

Prosecution by Assistant United States Attorney David Haller

Assistant United States Attorney David Haller is responsible for prosecuting the case against Teddy Nathan. Haller is part of the Violent Crime Unit, which focuses on handling cases related to violent offenses. With his experience and qualifications, Haller is well-equipped to present the evidence and arguments necessary to support the charges brought against Nathan.

Contact information for Community Outreach Coordinator Shane Jones

For any inquiries or further information regarding the case, Shane Jones, the Community Outreach Coordinator of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Louisiana, can be contacted. Jones plays an important role in facilitating communication between the community and the U.S. Attorney’s Office. His contact information is as follows:

  • Name: Shane Jones
  • Position: Community Outreach Coordinator
  • U.S. Attorney’s Office: Eastern District of Louisiana

Connection to Project Safe Neighborhoods

This case is directly linked to Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), an initiative focused on reducing violent crime and gun violence in communities. By bringing cases like Teddy Nathan’s to justice, PSN aims to deter felons from unlawfully possessing firearms and promote the safety and well-being of local neighborhoods. The efforts made in this case align with the goals of PSN to create safer communities through collaboration and enforcement of federal firearm laws.

Related content

For additional resources and insights, related content can be explored. Press releases regarding similar cases can provide further context on the enforcement of federal firearm laws. Additionally, sentencing outcomes of related cases can shed light on the potential penalties faced by individuals convicted of similar offenses. For more specific information related to the Eastern District of Louisiana, contact details for the district can be accessed.


Overview of the case

The case involving Teddy Nathan revolves around his alleged possession of a firearm despite being a convicted felon. By violating federal firearm laws outlined in the Federal Gun Control Act, Nathan is facing charges of possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. The case holds significant importance as it emphasizes the enforcement of federal firearm laws and the prevention of felons from possessing firearms.

Basic details of the case

The basic details of the case include Teddy Nathan, a 24-year-old resident of New Orleans, Louisiana, being charged with possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. This charge is a direct violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1), which prohibits individuals with felony convictions from possessing firearms or ammunition.

Importance of the case

This case is important as it highlights the enforcement of federal firearm laws and the efforts made to prevent felons from possessing firearms. By holding Teddy Nathan accountable for his alleged possession of ammunition, this case reinforces the importance of adhering to federal regulations and ensuring public safety.

Key individuals involved

The key individuals involved in the case include Teddy Nathan, the accused, and Assistant United States Attorney David Haller, who is responsible for prosecuting the case. Additionally, Community Outreach Coordinator Shane Jones serves as a point of contact for inquiries related to the case and provides information on behalf of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Mention of the Federal Gun Control Act

The case against Teddy Nathan is based on the violations of the Federal Gun Control Act. This act expressly prohibits individuals convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year from possessing firearms or ammunition. The charges brought against Nathan highlight the significance of this federal law in safeguarding communities and preventing firearm-related offenses by felons.


Charges against Teddy Nathan

Teddy Nathan is facing a single charge in this case, specifically one count of possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. This charge is based on the violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1), which specifically addresses firearm possession by individuals with felony convictions.

Count of possession of ammunition by a convicted felon

Teddy Nathan is accused of possessing ammunition despite being a convicted felon. This charge signifies the violation of federal law by having access to or possession of ammunition, which is considered a serious offense.

Violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1)

Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1) explicitly prohibits individuals with felony convictions from possessing firearms or ammunition. Teddy Nathan’s alleged possession of ammunition despite his conviction falls under this specific provision of federal law.


Potential penalties if convicted

If Teddy Nathan is proven guilty of the charges brought against him, there are potential penalties he may face. These penalties are in line with the severity of the offense and aim to ensure compliance with federal firearm laws.

Maximum term of imprisonment

If convicted, Teddy Nathan could face a maximum term of imprisonment of 15 years. This is a significant sentence that reflects the gravity of the offense and the potential threat posed by individuals with felony convictions in possession of firearms or ammunition.

Fine amount

In addition to imprisonment, Nathan may be required to pay a fine of up to $250,000. The imposed fine is intended to serve as a deterrent and further emphasize the seriousness of violating federal firearm laws.

Supervised release duration

Upon completion of the prison term, if sentenced, Teddy Nathan would be subject to a term of supervised release. This period can extend up to 3 years, during which Nathan would be required to adhere to specific conditions set by the court.

Mandatory special assessment fee

In addition to the imprisonment, fine, and supervised release, Nathan may also be subject to a mandatory special assessment fee of $100. This fee is a standard requirement for individuals convicted of federal offenses, serving to support various crime prevention and victim support programs.


Importance of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

In the American criminal justice system, it is crucial to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This standard ensures that a defendant is not wrongfully convicted and that their rights to a fair trial are protected.

Explanation of the burden of proof

The burden of proof lies with the prosecution in criminal cases. The prosecution must present sufficient evidence and establish that the defendant’s guilt is beyond any reasonable doubt. This standard requires a high level of certainty and guards against wrongful convictions.

Presumption of innocence

A fundamental principle of the American criminal justice system is that individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Teddy Nathan enjoys the presumption of innocence throughout the legal proceedings. It is the prosecution’s responsibility to present evidence that eliminates any reasonable doubt regarding Nathan’s guilt.

Role of the grand jury

In cases like Teddy Nathan’s, a grand jury may have been involved in the indictment process. The grand jury’s role is to review the evidence presented by the prosecution and determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed with a trial. If the grand jury finds probable cause, an indictment is issued, charging the defendant with the alleged crime.

Fair trial rights

Teddy Nathan, like any defendant, is entitled to the protection of fair trial rights, including the right to legal representation, the right to challenge the evidence presented against him, and the right to present his own defense. These rights safeguard the integrity of the legal process and ensure that justice is served based on the evidence presented and the principles of fairness.


Involvement of Project Safe Neighborhoods

This case directly relates to the initiative known as Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN). PSN is a program that brings together law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence.

Overview of Project Safe Neighborhoods

Project Safe Neighborhoods aims to create safer neighborhoods by reducing violent crime and gun violence through collaborative efforts between law enforcement agencies and local communities. PSN emphasizes the importance of trust and legitimacy, supporting community-based organizations, setting strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

Goal of reducing violent crime and gun violence

The primary goal of Project Safe Neighborhoods is to reduce violent crime and gun violence in communities. By targeting individuals, such as felons, who possess firearms unlawfully or engage in violent criminal activities, PSN strives to create safer environments in which residents can thrive.

Collaboration between law enforcement and communities

Project Safe Neighborhoods recognizes the significance of collaboration between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. By fostering trust and legitimacy, PSN seeks to establish a strong partnership that promotes effective communication, increased community involvement, and the sharing of information on crime prevention initiatives.

Implementing strategies to prevent violence

To accomplish its mission, PSN implements various strategies aimed at preventing violence. These strategies include proactive law enforcement efforts, community engagement programs, and targeted initiatives to address the root causes of crime. By implementing a comprehensive approach, PSN endeavors to reduce violence and improve overall community safety.


Role of law enforcement agencies in the investigation

Multiple law enforcement agencies were involved in the investigation of Teddy Nathan’s case, contributing to the gathering of evidence and subsequent indictment.

Federal Bureau of Investigation’s involvement

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) played a crucial role in the investigation. As a federal agency with jurisdiction over federal firearm offenses, the FBI contributed its expertise and resources to gathering evidence against Teddy Nathan. Their involvement ensured a thorough investigation and compliance with federal laws.

New Orleans Police Department’s involvement

The New Orleans Police Department also participated in the investigation of Teddy Nathan’s case. As the local law enforcement agency, they conducted on-the-ground investigative work, collected evidence, and collaborated with other agencies to build a strong case against Nathan.

Louisiana State Police’s involvement

The Louisiana State Police provided support and resources throughout the investigation. Their involvement contributed to the comprehensive nature of the case and ensured effective coordination among the different law enforcement agencies involved.


Prosecution by Assistant United States Attorney David Haller

Assistant United States Attorney David Haller is responsible for prosecuting the case against Teddy Nathan, representing the interests of the government in pursuing justice.

Responsibility of prosecuting the case

As the appointed federal prosecutor, Assistant United States Attorney David Haller bears the responsibility of presenting the evidence and arguments necessary to support the charges brought against Teddy Nathan. Haller will work diligently to prove Nathan’s guilt and obtain a just outcome.

Role in the Violent Crime Unit

Assistant United States Attorney David Haller operates within the Violent Crime Unit, a specialized unit within the United States Attorney’s Office. This unit focuses on handling cases relating to violent offenses, working to protect public safety and hold individuals accountable for their actions.

Experience and qualifications

Assistant United States Attorney David Haller brings a wealth of experience and qualifications to the prosecution of Teddy Nathan’s case. With a deep understanding of federal law and criminal procedure, Haller is well-equipped to navigate the legal process and uphold the principles of justice in the courtroom.


Contact information for Community Outreach Coordinator Shane Jones

For any inquiries or further information regarding the case, Shane Jones, the Community Outreach Coordinator of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Louisiana, can be contacted. Jones plays a pivotal role in facilitating communication between the community and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Name and position

  • Name: Shane Jones
  • Position: Community Outreach Coordinator

Role in the U.S. Attorney’s Office

As the Community Outreach Coordinator, Shane Jones serves as a liaison between the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the local community. Jones ensures that relevant information is shared and serves as a point of contact for inquiries related to the case or other matters involving the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Contact details

Contact information for Shane Jones, the Community Outreach Coordinator, can be obtained through the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Louisiana. Whether seeking case-specific details or general information, individuals can reach out to Jones for assistance.


Related content

For additional information or context, related content relating to the case or federal firearm laws can be explored.

Press releases of similar cases

Press releases regarding similar cases can provide valuable insights and context. By reviewing press releases related to prosecutions under federal firearm laws, individuals can gain a better understanding of the legal landscape, precedents, and enforcement efforts surrounding such offenses.

Sentencing outcomes of related cases

Information on the sentencing outcomes of related cases can shed light on the potential penalties individuals may face if convicted of federal firearm offenses. By examining these outcomes, individuals can gain an understanding of the repercussions and consequences associated with such violations.

Contact information for the Eastern District of Louisiana

For more detailed information specific to the Eastern District of Louisiana, including court procedures or additional resources, contact information for the district can be accessed. This allows individuals to seek out specific information or assistance related to the district’s operations.

By exploring related content, individuals can gain a broader understanding of the legal framework, enforcement efforts, and potential consequences associated with federal firearm offenses in the Eastern District of Louisiana.