WASHINGTON – The fallout from the twin bank failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank isn’t derailing the FDIC’s restoration plan… for now. The agency released its semiannual update today, attempting to project an air of stability amidst ongoing tremors in the banking sector. While acknowledging the damage, the FDIC insists the projected timeline for rebuilding its Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) remains on track, despite a combined loss of approximately $22.5 billion.
FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg delivered the carefully worded statement, emphasizing that staff projections show the losses from the two failures “are not expected to have a material effect” on reaching the statutory minimum reserve ratio of 1.35 percent. The agency expects to hit that benchmark ahead of the September 30, 2028 deadline, and, crucially, recommends *no changes* to the current restoration plan. This is a bold claim given the speed and scale of the recent collapses.
The devil, as always, is in the details. Of the $22.5 billion in losses, a staggering $19.2 billion is tied to protecting uninsured depositors under the Systemic Risk Exception. This means banks – not the DIF directly – will foot that bill through a special assessment. Only the remaining $3.3 billion will directly impact the Fund’s balance, and the FDIC downplays its significance. However, any further bank failures, especially of institutions with a high proportion of uninsured deposits, could quickly change that calculation.
The current situation stems from extraordinary deposit growth in the first and second quarters of 2020, fueled by pandemic-era stimulus and low interest rates. This growth caused the Fund’s reserve ratio to dip below the 1.35 percent threshold, triggering the need for a restoration plan. In June 2022, the FDIC Board approved an amendment, increasing deposit insurance assessment rates by two basis points for all insured institutions. That increase took effect at the beginning of 2023.
The FDIC’s attempt to project calm comes as scrutiny intensifies over the agency’s oversight of these banks leading up to their failures. Critics argue that regulators were too slow to address the risks associated with SVB and Signature Bank’s business models and concentration of uninsured deposits. While the agency insists the restoration plan is on track, the specter of further instability looms large, and the potential for more special assessments hangs over the banking industry.
The full semiannual update on the DIF Restoration Plan and Chairman Gruenberg’s statement are available on the FDIC website. Brian Sullivan, FDIC, can be contacted at 202-412-1436 for further inquiries. Grimy Times will continue to monitor the situation and report on any developments that threaten the stability of the financial system. Last Updated: April 18, 2023
RELATED: Banks Face Billions in Fees After SVB, Signature Bank Collapse
RELATED: Bank Bailout: FDIC Slaps Fees on Institutions After SVB, Signature Collapses
🔒 Get the grimiest stories delivered weekly. Subscribe free →
Browse More