Uber Traps Customers in Subscription Scam: NY AG Sues

NEW YORK – Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC are facing a multi-state legal onslaught after New York Attorney General Letitia James joined a bipartisan coalition of 20 other attorneys general in a lawsuit alleging the ride-share giant deliberately trapped customers in its Uber One subscription service. The suit, building on a case initially filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), claims Uber misled users with deceptive marketing and a byzantine cancellation process designed to bleed wallets.

The core of the complaint centers around Uber One, a $9.99 monthly (or $96 annually) subscription promising savings on rides and food deliveries. Attorney General James alleges Uber aggressively pushed users into these subscriptions, often without clear consent, then erected a digital labyrinth to prevent them from canceling. The lawsuit claims this practice is a blatant violation of both state and federal consumer protection laws.

“Unwanted subscriptions that are seemingly impossible to cancel are driving up costs for everyday New Yorkers,” Attorney General James stated. “Companies should not be able to profit by tricking consumers into recurring charges that can require hours of difficult work to stop. Today I am taking action to put an end to Uber’s misleading tactics and get New Yorkers their money back.” The Attorney General’s office is seeking restitution for affected consumers and a permanent injunction halting Uber’s alleged deceptive practices.

The lawsuit details how Uber allegedly misrepresented the benefits of Uber One, claiming consumers would “save $25 every month” without factoring in the $9.99 monthly subscription fee itself. More damningly, the complaint paints a picture of a deliberately confusing cancellation process. Users are allegedly forced to navigate at least seven different screens and perform a minimum of 12 actions to finally terminate their memberships. Even then, the “end membership” button vanishes within the final 48 hours of the billing cycle, forcing users to wait or endure another charge.

According to the Attorney General’s office, those who *do* manage to locate the cancellation button aren’t immediately unsubscribed. Instead, they’re bombarded with offers to pause their membership or accept discounts, further delaying the process and increasing the likelihood they’ll remain enrolled. The suit also alleges Uber sometimes billed consumers *before* their monthly cycle ended, resulting in charges for a subscription they believed was still within a free trial period.

The legal action seeks not only to recover funds for consumers but also to force Uber to fundamentally overhaul its subscription practices. The coalition of Attorneys General is demanding an end to the deceptive marketing and a simplified, transparent cancellation process. Grimy Times will continue to follow this case as it unfolds, exposing the tactics used by corporations to squeeze every last dollar from unsuspecting customers. The full complaint details a pattern of behavior that suggests Uber prioritized profit over transparency and consumer rights.

Key Facts

🔒 Get the grimiest stories delivered weekly. Subscribe free →

Browse More

All New York Cases →All Districts →


Posted

in

by