Repeat Offenders Back in Court: Illegal Re-Entry Cases

CLEVELAND, OH – Two men are facing federal charges in the Northern District of Ohio for the brazen act of illegally re-entering the United States after previously being deported. U.S. Attorney Steven M. Dettelbach announced the indictments this week, highlighting the ongoing struggle to secure the border and enforce immigration laws.

The first indictment centers around Hector Sanchez-Soto, 47, formerly of Cleveland. Authorities allege that Sanchez-Soto was found illegally present in the U.S. on January 5, 2013, after being deported following a prior conviction for – ironically – illegal re-entry after deportation. This isn’t a first offense; Sanchez-Soto appears to have a pattern of disregarding U.S. immigration law.

Just two days later, on January 7, 2013, Concepcion Quevedo-Rodriguez, 44, of Guatemala, was also indicted on similar charges. Quevedo-Rodriguez is accused of being illegally present in the United States after also being previously deported following a conviction for illegal re-entry. Details regarding the initial deportation and conviction remain scarce, but the charges paint a clear picture of repeated violations.

Federal prosecutors are quick to point out that an indictment is merely an accusation. Both Sanchez-Soto and Quevedo-Rodriguez are presumed innocent until proven guilty. They are entitled to a full and fair trial, where the government bears the burden of proving their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This isn’t a slam dunk; the defense will have ample opportunity to challenge the evidence.

The case against Sanchez-Soto is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Lauren Bell, with investigation led by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Meanwhile, Assistant United States Attorney Alissa M. Sterling is handling the case against Quevedo-Rodriguez, following an investigation by the U.S. Border Patrol in Sandusky, Ohio. Both agencies are working to keep these individuals off the streets.

If convicted, the sentencing will be at the discretion of the Court, taking into account each defendant’s criminal history, their role in the offense, and the specific circumstances of the violation. While the maximum statutory sentence exists, it’s almost certain the final sentence will be less. Grimy Times will continue to follow these cases and report on the outcome, because accountability matters.

RELATED: Billions Stolen from Taxpayers: HHS Watchdog Uncovers Massive Fraud

RELATED: Drunk Drivers Claim Lives, ICE Detainers Filed