Jarrett Edmonds, Drug Trafficking, Pennsylvania 2018

A Wilkes-Barre man has been charged with trafficking heroin, fentanyl, and crack cocaine in Luzerne County.

Jarrett Edmonds, also known as ‘Lollipop’ and ‘Dollar,’ age 36, was indicted on November 13, 2018, by a federal grand jury for possession with intent to distribute heroin, fentanyl, and crack cocaine.

The case was unsealed following Edmonds’ arrest.

According to United States Attorney David J. Freed, the indictment alleges that Edmonds possessed with the intent to distribute heroin, fentanyl, and crack cocaine on July 7, 2017, in Luzerne County.

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Wilkes-Barre Police. Assistant United States Attorney Francis P. Sempa is prosecuting the case.

This case was brought as part of a district-wide initiative to combat the nationwide epidemic regarding the use and distribution of heroin. Led by the United States Attorney’s Office, the Heroin Initiative targets heroin traffickers operating in the Middle District of Pennsylvania and is part of a coordinated effort among federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who commit heroin-related offenses.

This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. Attorney General Jeff Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, locally-based strategies to reduce violent crime.

Indictments are only allegations. All persons charged are presumed to be innocent unless and until found guilty in court.

The maximum penalty under federal law for this offense is 20 years’ imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances, and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public, and provide for the defendant’s educational, vocational, and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.