BP Products North America Inc., Clean Air Act Violation, Texas 2009

Texas City, TX – BP Products North America Inc. has been slapped with a record-breaking $50 million criminal fine and three years of probation following a guilty plea related to violations of the Clean Air Act stemming from the catastrophic 2005 explosion at its Texas City Refinery. The sentencing, handed down on March 12, 2009, marks the largest criminal penalty ever assessed under the federal environmental law and the first successful prosecution under a specific section designed to prevent accidental releases causing death or serious injury.

The case, investigated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), centers around failures that contributed to the March 23, 2005, explosion that claimed the lives of 15 contract workers and injured over 170 more. While the explosion itself triggered numerous lawsuits and investigations, the EPA’s criminal probe focused specifically on BP’s alleged failures to comply with regulations aimed at preventing accidental chemical releases. Investigators found systemic deficiencies in safety procedures and equipment maintenance, ultimately leading to the deadly incident.

BP was initially charged on October 22, 2007, with one count of knowingly violating sections 42 U.S.C. 7413(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act. This charge stemmed from a failure to adhere to the requirements outlined in 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(7) and 40 C.F.R. 68.73(b), specifically regarding the proper implementation of a risk management plan designed to prevent accidental releases of hazardous chemicals. The EPA alleged that BP had failed to adequately assess the risks associated with its operations and implement necessary safeguards.

The guilty plea, entered on the same day as the sentencing, avoids a protracted trial but acknowledges BP’s responsibility in the disaster. Sources close to the investigation indicate that the EPA’s pursuit of criminal charges was driven by a desire to send a strong message to the industry about the importance of prioritizing safety and complying with environmental regulations. The $50 million fine is intended not only to punish BP but also to fund environmental remediation projects and bolster safety initiatives.

The probation period requires BP to implement a comprehensive compliance program under the oversight of a federal monitor. This program will focus on improving safety procedures, conducting regular audits, and ensuring that all employees are properly trained in hazard identification and risk mitigation. The EPA will closely monitor BP’s progress throughout the probationary period, with the potential for further penalties if violations are discovered.

This case highlights the increasing willingness of federal authorities to pursue criminal charges against corporations for environmental violations that result in harm to human life. The Texas City disaster served as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of negligence in the oil refining industry, and the EPA’s successful prosecution of BP sends a clear signal that such failures will not be tolerated. The incident also prompted widespread reviews of safety protocols at refineries across the country.

Table of Contents

Key Facts

Defendant: BP Products North America Inc.
Crime: Violation of the Clean Air Act
State: Texas
Year: 2009
Statutes Violated: 42 U.S.C. 7413(c)(1), 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(7), 40 C.F.R. 68.73(b)
Penalty: $50 million criminal fine and 3 years of probation
Incident: Explosion at BP’s Texas City Refinery on March 23, 2005
Casualties: 15 fatalities and over 170 injuries
Significance: Largest criminal fine ever assessed under the Clean Air Act; first prosecution under a specific CAA section relating to accidental releases.