Deported Duo Busted for Illegal Reentry in PA

HARRISBURG, PA – Two men, once removed from the United States, are now facing federal charges for brazenly returning to American soil. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced indictments handed down on September 9, 2020, targeting individuals who allegedly skirted immigration law and slipped back into the country after prior deportation orders.

Saldivar Tapia, previously deported to Mexico in June 2013, is accused of illegally reentering the U.S. sometime after his removal. He was discovered in Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, actively avoiding inspection by immigration authorities – a clear indication of intent to remain hidden from the law. The details of how Tapia managed to evade detection remain under investigation, but sources suggest a network may have been involved.

Separately, Marin Ortiz, also deported to Mexico – in October 2017 – stands accused of the same offense. Ortiz allegedly reentered the U.S. after his deportation and was found in York County, Pennsylvania, also actively evading immigration officials. The repeated pattern of illegal reentry raises questions about the effectiveness of current deportation measures and border security.

Federal investigators with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Removal Operations (ERO) spearheaded the investigation into both cases. Their work uncovered evidence supporting the allegations against Tapia and Ortiz, leading to the federal grand jury indictments. Assistant United States Attorney Joanne Sanderson is handling the prosecution, promising a vigorous pursuit of justice.

It’s crucial to remember that these indictments are merely allegations at this stage. Both Saldivar Tapia and Marin Ortiz are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. However, a conviction for illegal reentry carries significant penalties under federal law, with sentencing determined by a judge considering a range of factors beyond statutory maximums – including the defendant’s history and the seriousness of the offense.

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines mandate consideration of the crime’s impact, the defendant’s background, and the need for public safety. While the statutory maximum provides a ceiling, the actual sentence could vary substantially. Grimy Times will continue to follow this case as it progresses through the legal system, providing updates on any developments. # # #

RELATED: Dominican Man Pleads Guilty to Fentanyl Smuggling

RELATED: Top Execs Busted in Export Control Violations Scandal