Federal authorities in the Eastern District of California announced that Furry was sentenced to 265 months in federal prison after being convicted of immigration fraud in violation of federal immigration law.
According to the criminal complaint and other court records filed in United States v. Furry (Case No. 2:09-cr-00342), Furry was encountered by federal agents in California after having been previously deported from the United States on 4 separate occasions. Despite prior orders of removal, Furry unlawfully returned to the country without obtaining the required permission from the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security.
Court records indicate that Furry had a prior criminal history that included a conviction for theft, which elevated the severity of the immigration offense under federal sentencing guidelines. The prior criminal record was a significant factor in the government’s prosecution strategy and the ultimate sentence imposed by the court.
The case was investigated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), whose agents initially encountered Furry during a routine enforcement operation in California. A subsequent background check revealed Furry’s immigration history, including the prior removals and criminal record.
U.S. District Judge Charles Wright imposed the sentence during a hearing at the federal courthouse. In pronouncing the sentence, the judge noted the repeated nature of the violations and the need to deter future illegal reentries. The court also ordered a $100 special assessment and 4 years of supervised release upon release, after which Furry will face deportation proceedings.
Assistant United States Attorney Thomas Thomas handled the prosecution. In court filings, Thomas Thomas argued that the sentence was appropriate given Furry’s history of immigration violations and prior criminal conduct. The prosecution emphasized that individuals who repeatedly flout immigration laws after deportation pose a public safety concern.
Under federal law, illegal reentry after deportation carries enhanced penalties when the defendant has prior criminal convictions. The offense carries a statutory maximum of 20 years in federal prison when the defendant was previously removed subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony.
This prosecution was part of a broader federal initiative to target individuals who repeatedly violate immigration laws, particularly those with criminal histories. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has identified the prosecution of recidivist immigration offenders as a key enforcement priority in the California region.
Following completion of the federal sentence, Furry will be subject to removal proceedings and will face additional criminal penalties if found unlawfully present in the United States in the future.
Related Federal Cases
- Ramos-Aviles, Immigration Fraud, California 1998 · California
- Valdivia-Ramirez, Immigration Fraud, California 1993 · California
- Lopez-Marquez, Immigration Fraud, California 2006 · California
- Medina-Sandoval, Immigration Fraud, California 1998 · California
- Acosta, Immigration Fraud, California 1998 · California
