A Connecticut contractor has been sentenced for a brazen scheme to defraud the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by falsifying lead abatement inspection reports. John Scheerer, 41, of Thomaston, was sentenced to two years of probation, including six months of home confinement, and ordered to pay $11,160 in restitution and a $1,000 fine. The case, investigated by the Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Investigation Division, reveals a calculated effort to cut corners on federally funded home improvement projects, potentially endangering residents.
Between March 2006 and March 2010, Scheerer submitted approximately 30 fraudulent lead abatement clearance reports for properties undergoing renovation through HUD’s revitalization program. This program provides federal funds to Connecticut cities and towns to assist homeowners with repairs. Instead of securing legitimate post-abatement inspections, Scheerer fabricated reports using the letterhead of a third-party lead inspection company, forging the signature of the company’s president. These reports falsely claimed that comprehensive testing had been conducted, confirming the homes were free of lead hazards and met HUD standards.
The scheme wasn’t merely a paperwork issue. The fabricated reports allowed Scheerer to falsely claim compliance with HUD regulations, potentially exposing vulnerable populations – particularly children – to dangerous lead levels. While subsequent testing conducted by affected municipalities revealed no *significant* lead hazards remained, the fraudulent submissions forced cities and towns to expend additional, unnecessary funds to verify the safety of the properties. This misuse of public funds constitutes the core of the criminal activity.
Key Facts
- Defendant: John Scheerer, 41, Thomaston, CT
- Crime: Falsifying lead abatement clearance reports
- Victim: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Connecticut municipalities
- Duration of Fraud: March 2006 – March 2010
- Number of Fraudulent Reports: Approximately 30
- Restitution Ordered: $11,160
- Fine: $1,000
- Sentence: Two years probation, six months home confinement
Scheerer initially pleaded guilty on May 3, 2012, to one count of making and using a false document, a violation of Title 18 U.S. Criminal Code, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1001. He also violated 33 U.S.C. 1319, pertaining to false statements related to clean water and environmental regulations, despite the case primarily revolving around lead abatement. The maximum possible sentence for the charge was five years imprisonment, but Judge Janet Bond Arterton opted for a probationary sentence, likely due to the lack of evidence suggesting actual harm to residents beyond the financial burden placed on local governments.
The prosecution was handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Neeraj Patel and EPA Regional Criminal Enforcement Counsel Peter Kenyon, highlighting the collaborative effort between federal and environmental agencies to combat fraud and protect public health. This case serves as a stark reminder of the potential for abuse within federally funded programs and the importance of rigorous oversight to ensure accountability and the safety of communities. The EPA continues to prioritize investigations into environmental fraud, emphasizing that those who prioritize profit over public safety will be held accountable.
GrimyTimes will continue to follow this case and report on any further developments.
Source: EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Database
Related Federal Cases
- John A. Masanotti, Jr., Investment Fraud, Florida 2024 · Connecticut
- Thao Thi Kim Nguyen, Mortgage Fraud, Orange County CA, 2018 · Connecticut
- Mark Roy Anderson, Hemp Farm Wire Fraud, Beverly Hills CA, 2023 · California
- Jan R. Kowalski, Bankruptcy Fraud, Chicago IL, 2023 · Illinois
- John Doe, Pandemic Assistance Theft, Providence RI, 2023 · Rhode Island

