Ahmad Jbawi, Unemployment Benefits Fraud, Rhode Island 2008

A North Providence man has been accused of collecting over $35,000 in unemployment benefits while living in Syria, according to a complaint filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Ahmad Jbawi, 39, allegedly made multiple false representations to the State of Rhode Island’s Department of Labor and Training in order to collect federally funded extended unemployment benefits to which he was not entitled. It is alleged that Jbawi falsely claimed and certified that he was able and available for work when this was not true under Rhode Island State law.

In the wake of the global financial crisis, in 2008 Congress authorized multiple federally-funded extensions of benefits for individuals collecting unemployment. In many cases, these extension payments, administered by the state, were critical to the ability of unemployed individuals to meet basic economic needs.

Under program guidelines, however, to receive unemployment benefits, an applicant is required to certify that he/she are able and available for work and attached to the labor market. An applicant is also required to report any self or outside employment to the state.

The government’s case is brought under the False Claims Act, which allows the United States to recover federal funds that are paid out as a result of fraud, as well as triple damages and penalties of between $5,500 and $11,000 for each false claim submitted. According to the complaint, it is alleged that Jbawi made at least 56 false claims and fraudulently collected $34,290 in federally funded unemployment benefits.

“While the amount in question may appear to some to be modest, the principle at issue in this case is not,” said United States Attorney Peter F. Neronha. “These funds were designated to provide unemployed individuals the opportunity to support themselves and their families through difficult times while they looked for work, not to reward fraud like the conduct alleged here. This Office will vigorously pursue abuses of this program with all the legal tools at our disposal.”

A Civil Complaint is merely an allegation and is not evidence of guilt or liability, which the government is required to establish by a preponderance of the evidence.

Related Federal Cases