Robert Alvin Justus Jr. convicted for aiding and abetting murder of Officer Underwood

Robert Alvin Justus Jr. convicted for aiding and abetting murder of Officer Underwood. Read about the shocking details and legal proceedings here.

In a recent court ruling, Robert Alvin Justus Jr. has been found guilty of aiding and abetting the heinous murder of Protective Services Officer Dave Patrick Underwood, as well as the attempted murder of another officer in a drive-by shooting at a federal courthouse in Oakland, CA. Acting as the driver of the vehicle, Justus facilitated the deadly act by providing Steven Carrillo with the opportunity to fire gunshots that tragically claimed Officer Underwood’s life and inflicted injuries upon his colleague. Motivated by their shared allegiance to the right-wing anti-government movement known as Boogaloo, Justus now awaits a mandatory life sentence in prison. This reprehensible incident serves as a stark reminder of the gravity of such crimes and the importance of upholding justice for the victims and their families.


Robert Alvin Justus Jr. has been convicted of aiding and abetting the murder of Protective Services Officer Dave Patrick Underwood and aiding and abetting the attempted murder of another officer in a drive-by shooting at a federal courthouse in Oakland, CA. This shocking crime took place in May 2020 and sent shockwaves through the law enforcement community and the public at large.

Involvement in the Crime

As per the investigation, Robert Alvin Justus Jr. played a pivotal role in the drive-by shooting incident. He was identified as the driver of the vehicle from which Steven Carrillo fired the gunshots that tragically ended Officer Underwood’s life and injured the second officer. This involvement in such a heinous crime has led to intense scrutiny of Justus and the motives behind his actions.

Moreover, it has come to light that Justus and Carrillo shared a common allegiance to a right-wing, anti-government movement known as Boogaloo. This connection to an extremist ideology raises concerns and adds a further layer of complexity to the investigation.

Details of the Crime

The drive-by shooting took place at a federal courthouse in Oakland, CA. It occurred in the evening, when Officer Underwood and the second officer were on duty, protecting the courthouse premises. It is alleged that Justus drove the vehicle, enabling Carrillo to open fire on the unsuspecting officers.

The events leading up to the crime are still under investigation, but it is believed that Justus and Carrillo planned and coordinated the attack. The specific motive behind targeting law enforcement officers remains a subject of ongoing investigation.

Furthermore, the evidence against Justus continues to be gathered and analyzed by law enforcement agencies involved in the case. This evidence is crucial in establishing his level of involvement and determining the appropriate charges to be filed.


Immediately after the drive-by shooting, a criminal investigation was initiated to unravel the circumstances surrounding the incident. Multiple law enforcement agencies, including federal and local authorities, have been diligently working together to gather evidence and bring the perpetrators to justice.

The gathering of evidence includes forensic analysis of the crime scene, examination of ballistic evidence, and gathering surveillance footage from surrounding areas. Additionally, the interrogation of suspects, including Justus, has provided valuable insights into the planning and execution of the crime.

Arrest and Legal Proceedings

Following a thorough investigation, Robert Alvin Justus Jr. was apprehended by law enforcement officials. He was taken into custody without incident, and his arrest marked a significant milestone in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Justus underwent the standard booking process, and initial hearings were conducted to establish the charges against him. Given the gravity of his alleged crimes, charges of aiding and abetting murder, as well as aiding and abetting attempted murder, were filed against him.

As with any criminal case, Justus is entitled to legal representation. His defense attorney will play a crucial role in safeguarding his rights and ensuring a fair trial.


The trial against Robert Alvin Justus Jr. commenced with the prosecution presenting their case against him. Prosecutors laid out the evidence, highlighting Justus’s integral role in the drive-by shooting. They presented eyewitness testimonies, expert analysis, and other supporting evidence to establish culpability.

On the other hand, the defense built their strategy around rebutting the prosecution’s claims and presenting an alternative narrative. They questioned the credibility of the evidence, cross-examined witnesses, and sought to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.

Throughout the trial, witness testimonies shed light on the direct involvement of Justus in the crime, thereby corroborating the prosecution’s case. The prosecution also presented extensive evidence, including surveillance footage, ballistic analysis, and communications between the co-conspirators.

After the presentation of evidence and witness testimonies, the trial concluded with both the prosecution and the defense delivering their closing arguments. These arguments summarized the key points of their cases and urged the jury to arrive at a fair and just verdict.

Court Verdict

Following the conclusion of the trial, the jury deliberated on the evidence and arguments presented. After careful consideration, they reached a unanimous guilty verdict for Robert Alvin Justus Jr. for aiding and abetting murder and attempted murder.

The guilty verdict reflects the jury’s belief that Justus played a significant role in the crimes committed. The potential consequences of this conviction are substantial, and it is expected that Justus will face a mandatory life sentence in prison. This sentence underscores the severity of the crimes and serves as a deterrent against future acts of violence.

Impact and Reactions

The conviction of Robert Alvin Justus Jr. has had a profound impact on many people, particularly the families of the victims. Officer Underwood’s family is left mourning the loss of their loved one, while the injured officer’s family grapples with the physical and emotional aftermath of the attack. The pain and trauma inflicted upon these families cannot be overstated.

Furthermore, the law enforcement community has been deeply affected by this crime. The senseless violence perpetrated against officers serving to protect and uphold the law has resonated throughout the law enforcement community, leading to heightened vigilance and renewed determination to ensure officer safety.

The conviction of Justus has also sparked public reactions, with people expressing shock, outrage, and a desire for justice to be served. The incident has sparked conversations about the dangers of right-wing anti-government movements and the importance of addressing extremist ideologies that may lead to violence.

Appeals and Further Legal Actions

As with any criminal conviction, there is a possibility of appeals by Robert Alvin Justus Jr. Appeals may be filed based on various legal grounds, such as procedural errors during the trial, ineffective legal representation, or newly discovered evidence.

The appeals process involves a series of legal procedures, including the preparation and filing of appellate briefs by the defense, the review and response by the prosecution, and the subsequent hearings before the appellate court. It is the defense attorney’s responsibility to navigate the appeals process and ensure that Justus’s rights are protected.

The potential outcomes of the appeals are varied. Depending on the court’s ruling, the conviction may be upheld, overturned, or a new trial may be ordered. The appeals process can prolong the legal proceedings, often stretching over several months or even years.

Life Sentence and Incarceration

Given the nature of the crimes committed, Robert Alvin Justus Jr. is likely to face a mandatory life sentence in prison. A mandatory life sentence typically means that the convicted individual will spend the remainder of their life behind bars, without the possibility of parole or early release.

Justus’s incarceration will likely take place in a secure correctional facility, designated to house individuals who have been convicted of violent crimes. This ensures the safety and security of both the inmate and the surrounding community.

While serving a life sentence, Justus will be subject to various restrictions and conditions. These may include limited visitation rights, strict monitoring, and participation in correctional programs aimed at rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

The correctional programs provided aim to address the underlying factors contributing to criminal behavior and promote personal growth and rehabilitation. These programs may include vocational training, educational opportunities, substance abuse treatment, and mental health support.

In conclusion, the conviction of Robert Alvin Justus Jr. for aiding and abetting murder and attempted murder has brought some measure of justice to the victims and their families. The comprehensive investigation, fair trial, and subsequent guilty verdict demonstrate the commitment of law enforcement agencies and the legal system to holding perpetrators accountable.

This case also serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of extremist ideologies and the urgent need to address the underlying factors that contribute to violence in our society. As we strive to build safer communities, it is essential to continue the dialogue surrounding right-wing anti-government movements and work towards fostering understanding and empathy.