Oscar Yanes, Detention Challenge, Rhode Island 2023

PROVIDENCE, RI – Oscar Yanes is fighting back against his detention, filing a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. The case, Yanes v. Martin, pits Yanes against Daniel W. Martin and a slew of federal officials and entities, including Matthew T. Albence and the Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation. The filing suggests a challenge to the legality of Yanes’s imprisonment, potentially raising concerns about due process and conditions of confinement.

The petition, case number 28:2241, centers on federal law – specifically, the challenging of detention through a 28 U.S. Code Section 2241 petition. This isn’t a simple claim of innocence; it’s a direct appeal to the federal court to review the circumstances of Yanes’s continued detention. The involvement of Albence, previously a high-ranking Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official, and Chad F. Wolf, former Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, indicates potential issues related to immigration proceedings or federal enforcement actions. Gagik Mkrtchian and Elmer Alfredo Arevalo Carrillo are also listed as parties, potentially co-detainees or individuals connected to Yanes’s case.

A formidable legal team has assembled to represent Yanes. Attorneys Susan B. Manning, Michael E. Jusczyk, Natalie A. Bennett, Stephanie Faraci, Michael A. Hacker, Lindsey B. Kaley, Alborz Hassani, Sandra R. Hebert, Deborah S. Gonzalez, Bethany N. Wong, Amy M. Dudash, Jared A. Goldstein, William E. O’Gara, Omar C. Jadwat, Ronald R. Gendron, Richard Myrus, Morgan Russell, James P. Looby, Brian J. Lamoureux, David C. Fathi, Michael K. T. Tan, Eunice H. Cho, Emma Diamond Hall, Zachary A. Cunha, Ricca Prasad, and John P McAdams are all listed as counsel for Yanes, suggesting a complex and well-resourced legal battle. The sheer number of attorneys suggests a broad scope of arguments likely to be presented.

While the specific grounds for the habeas petition remain sealed within the court documents at this time, a writ of habeas corpus is generally used to challenge unlawful detention. This could involve claims of inadequate legal representation, procedural errors during detention, or violations of constitutional rights. The Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation’s inclusion as a party points to potential allegations regarding the conditions within the facility itself – overcrowding, lack of medical care, or other issues that could constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The Grimy Times will continue to pursue details on the specific allegations made in the petition.

The District Court, presided over by Judge Zachary A. Cunha, will now review the petition and determine whether a hearing is warranted. Martin, as the opposing counsel, will likely file a response, outlining the government’s justification for Yanes’s continued detention. This case highlights the ongoing legal battles fought within the federal system over immigration enforcement and the rights of those held in detention. Expect a protracted legal fight with potentially far-reaching implications.

The Grimy Times will continue to monitor Yanes v. Martin and provide updates as they become available. The involvement of so many legal professionals and federal agencies indicates a case with significant implications for immigration law and detention practices. The court docket is publicly accessible, but details surrounding the underlying allegations remain largely obscured, leaving many questions unanswered.

MORE FEDERAL CRIME NEWS

Organized Crime

Berte Fabian, Racketeering, New Jersey 2022

Jan 15, 2022

Organized Crime

Dery Joncarlos Zelaya-Zelaya, Illegal Re-entry, Louisiana 2025

Jul 3, 2025

Organized Crime

Unknown Defendant, Organized Crime, New York NY, 1983

Apr 1, 1982

Organized Crime

Garo Perez, Racketeering, New Jersey 2019

Jan 15, 2019