Reno, NV – Aerolite Corporation, a Reno-based electroplating and metal finishing company, was convicted in December 1990 on eleven counts of violating the Clean Water Act (CWA) following a federal grand jury indictment in February of the same year. The case, investigated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and prosecuted by the Department of Justice, revealed a pattern of negligent and knowing discharges of toxic pollutants into the Reno-Sparks publicly owned treatment works (POTW).
The company specialized in electroplating and refinishing, servicing both automotive and firearm industries – including the refinishing of handguns. This process generated significant industrial wastewater laden with hazardous substances. According to court documents, Aerolite failed to adequately maintain its pretreatment equipment, designed to remove pollutants *before* discharge, and instead knowingly and negligently released untreated wastewater directly into the city’s drainage system.
The indictment detailed that Aerolite’s discharges contained alarming levels of cyanide, lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc – all commonly associated with electroplating processes and highly detrimental to both environmental and public health. The POTW, while equipped to handle some level of industrial discharge, was overwhelmed by the volume and toxicity of Aerolite’s effluent, potentially impacting the efficacy of the wastewater treatment process and posing risks to the Truckee River.
The trial, which concluded with a jury conviction on all eleven counts, focused heavily on evidence demonstrating Aerolite’s awareness of the faulty pretreatment systems and its conscious disregard for compliance with established environmental regulations. Prosecutors presented testimony and documentation highlighting the company’s failure to adhere to its permitted discharge limits and pretreatment standards, as mandated by the CWA.
Legal Ramifications
Aerolite Corporation was found to have violated sections 33 U.S.C. 1317(d) and 33 U.S.C. 1319(c)(2)(A) of the Clean Water Act. These sections address the prohibition of pollutant discharges in violation of permits and pretreatment standards. While specific penalty details were not immediately available, violations of the CWA can result in substantial fines – both criminal and civil – as well as potential imprisonment for responsible corporate officers. The EPA often seeks remediation costs and supplemental environmental projects as part of settlements in these types of cases.
Key Facts
- Defendant: Aerolite Corporation
- Location: Reno, Nevada
- Crime: Clean Water Act Violations
- Year: 1991 (Indictment 1990)
- Pollutants: Cyanide, Lead, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Nickel, Zinc
- Victim: Reno-Sparks POTW & potentially the Truckee River
- Statutes Violated: 33 U.S.C. 1317(d), 33 U.S.C. 1319(c)(2)(A)
This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of industrial compliance with environmental regulations and the potential consequences of prioritizing profit over responsible waste management. GrimyTimes will continue to follow any further developments in this case, including sentencing and potential remediation efforts.
Source: EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Database
Related Federal Cases
- John Hubenka, Clean Water Act Violation, WY 2005 · New York
- Gandaji Chavda, Clean Water Act Violation, CA 2006 · New York
- Danny Lee Hill, Clean Water Act Violation, NC 2003 · New York
- Ted Matthew Gibbons, Clean Water Act Violation, MN 2006 · Minnesota
- Albert David Hajduk, Clean Water Act Violation, CO 2006 · Illinois

