Ambers Scott Rind, Asbestos Removal, WV 2003

MARTINSBURG, WV – Ambers Scott Rind was sentenced to probation and fined for illegally removing and disposing of asbestos-containing materials in Martinsburg, West Virginia, in 2002. The case, brought by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), highlights the dangers of improper asbestos handling and the legal repercussions for those who disregard environmental regulations.

According to court documents, Rind knowingly removed asbestos floor tile from a facility without filing the required asbestos notification forms. This is a direct violation of regulations designed to protect both workers and the public from the health hazards associated with asbestos exposure. Instead of properly containing and disposing of the hazardous material, Rind illegally dumped the asbestos waste on farmland also located in Martinsburg, potentially contaminating the soil and posing a long-term health risk to the surrounding community.

The investigation, which began in June 2002, revealed a pattern of deliberate disregard for safety protocols. Rind was initially charged with one count of violating the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) – specifically 15 U.S.C. 2646. However, the charges quickly expanded to include six counts of making false statements, a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001, and seven counts related to violations of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412 & 42 U.S.C. 7413). The false statements charges suggest Rind attempted to mislead investigators regarding the handling and disposal of the asbestos.

In November 2002, Rind entered a guilty plea to all 14 counts, admitting to the illegal asbestos removal, improper disposal, and providing false information to authorities. The plea effectively ended the legal proceedings, leading to a sentencing hearing in June 2003. The EPA’s enforcement action underscores the agency’s commitment to holding individuals accountable for environmental crimes, even when those crimes appear localized.

Table of Contents

Toggle

Penalties & Legal Ramifications

On June 3, 2003, Rind received a sentence of 36 months probation, a relatively lenient penalty considering the severity of the environmental and health risks posed by asbestos. In addition to probation, Rind was ordered to pay $25 in fees and a $5,000 federal fine. While the financial penalties are significant, legal experts note that the probation period and relatively small fine may not fully reflect the potential long-term consequences of improper asbestos handling, including potential health issues for those exposed.

Key Facts

Defendant: Ambers Scott Rind
Location: Martinsburg, West Virginia
Year of Offense: 2002
Statutes Violated: 15 U.S.C. 2646 (TSCA), 18 U.S.C. 1001 (False Statements), 42 U.S.C. 7412 & 42 U.S.C. 7413 (Clean Air Act)
Sentence: 36 months probation, $25 in fees, $5,000 fine
Crime: Illegal removal and improper disposal of asbestos-containing materials.

GrimyTimes will continue to follow this case and report on any further developments. Readers are encouraged to report suspected environmental violations to the EPA.

Source: EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Database

Related Federal Cases