Fluid Packaging Co., Inc., Pollution, NJ 1997

Brick, NJ – Fluid Packaging Co., Inc. was slapped with a hefty fine totaling $518,802 after pleading guilty to illegally discharging industrial waste into a sensitive New Jersey wetland in 1997. The company’s actions threatened a critical drinking water source and sparked an investigation by state environmental authorities.

According to court documents, the violations occurred when production wastes from the Fluid Packaging facility were knowingly directed through a storm drain. This drain ultimately fed into a local wetland, a vital ecosystem that filters water and provides habitat, before emptying into the Metedeconk River. The Metedeconk River serves as a key component of the region’s public drinking water supply, raising significant concerns about potential contamination and public health risks.

The case unfolded swiftly following the initial charges on August 6, 1997. Investigators determined that Fluid Packaging bypassed proper waste management protocols, opting for the cheaper, albeit illegal, method of direct discharge. Evidence suggested the company was aware of the potential environmental consequences, yet continued the practice. The guilty plea, entered in an information, covered multiple counts related to the unlawful pollution.

On September 12, 1997, the sentencing judge levied the substantial fine, signaling a strong stance against industrial polluters in the state. While no information regarding remediation efforts undertaken by Fluid Packaging has been publicly released, the penalty aims to deter future violations and cover the costs associated with potential environmental damage. Environmental advocacy groups have noted that while the fine is significant, long-term monitoring of the Metedeconk River and the affected wetlands remains crucial.

Table of Contents

Key Facts

Defendant: Fluid Packaging Co., Inc.
Location: Brick, New Jersey
Crime: Illegal discharge of industrial waste into wetlands and a drinking water source.
Date of Sentencing: September 12, 1997
Fine: $518,802
Statutes Violated: 2C:17-2(a)(2), 2C:17-2C, 58:10A-6A, and two counts of 58:10A-10F(2) – New Jersey state laws pertaining to water pollution and environmental crimes.

The specific charges highlight the gravity of the offense. 2C:17-2(a)(2) addresses the unlawful discharge of pollutants, 2C:17-2C concerns offenses against water pollution control, and 58:10A-6A relates to the prohibition of discharge of pollutants. The multiple counts of 58:10A-10F(2) specifically address violations regarding industrial waste management and discharge permits. The combination of these charges underscores a pattern of disregard for environmental regulations.

GrimyTimes will continue to follow this case and report on any further developments, including any potential long-term environmental impacts or further legal action. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of corporate accountability and the need for vigilant enforcement of environmental laws to protect public health and the integrity of New Jersey’s natural resources.

Source: EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Database

Related Federal Cases