Biglari Holdings Inc., a San Antonio-based company, has agreed to pay a hefty $850,000 civil penalty for violating the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act of 1976.
The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division brought the case against Biglari Holdings, alleging that the company failed to comply with the antitrust premerger notification requirements before acquiring voting securities of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc. in June 2011.
According to the complaint, Biglari Holdings’ acquisitions were not made solely for the purpose of investment, which exempted them from the HSR Act’s premerger notification requirements. The company was in violation of the HSR Act from June 8, 2011, through September 22, 2011.
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976 imposes notification and waiting period requirements on individuals and companies over a certain size before they consummate acquisitions resulting in holding stock or assets above a certain value, which was $66 million in 2011 and is currently $68.2 million.
Federal courts can assess civil penalties for premerger notification violations under the HSR Act in lawsuits brought by the Department of Justice. For a party in violation of the HSR Act, the maximum civil penalty is $16,000 a day, which would equate to $5.8 million over the 366-day period of the alleged violation.
The proposed settlement, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., will settle the charges against Biglari Holdings if approved by the court. The company will pay the $850,000 civil penalty to settle the charges.
The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division took action against Biglari Holdings at the request of the Federal Trade Commission. The case highlights the importance of complying with antitrust premerger notification requirements to avoid hefty penalties.
Biglari Holdings’ failure to comply with the HSR Act’s premerger notification requirements has resulted in a significant financial penalty for the company. The case serves as a reminder to companies to ensure they comply with all applicable laws and regulations to avoid similar consequences.
The proposed settlement and the allegations against Biglari Holdings are a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and compliance in business dealings. The case will be closely watched by companies and regulators alike as it navigates the complexities of antitrust law.
Related Federal Cases
- Google Hit with Antitrust Win in New York AG’s Suit · New Hampshire
- Ramaswamy Snubs VP Slot, Wants to Build, Not Wait · Washington
- Ramaswamy: No VP Slot For Me · Washington
- Profits Down, Prices Cooling? The Greed Factor · Washington
- Ukraine Offensive Stalls: US Doubt Grows · Washington
