GrimyTimes.com - The Largest Criminal Database

Stevens Analytical Laboratories, Mail Fraud, MA 1992

Stoneham, Massachusetts – Stevens Analytical Laboratories, Incorporated, and its owner, Alan Stevens, were convicted of mail fraud in 1992 after a scheme to provide falsified drinking water analysis reports came to light. The lab, certified to test water samples for chemical components, catered to companies needing to demonstrate regulatory compliance, making the integrity of its reports paramount.

According to court documents, Stevens and his corporation were charged on March 23, 1992, with ten counts of mail fraud, a violation of Title 18 U.S. Criminal Code, Section 1341 (18 U.S.C. 1341). The indictment alleged that Stevens knowingly mailed false analytical results to customers who had paid for accurate testing, effectively defrauding them and potentially jeopardizing public health and environmental oversight.

The scheme involved submitting fabricated data in official reports. These reports were relied upon by client companies to demonstrate adherence to environmental regulations, meaning the falsified results could have allowed polluting activities to go undetected. Investigators believe the motive was likely financial, as accurate testing is costly and time-consuming, while falsification offered a cheaper, faster route to profit.

On May 27, 1992, both Stevens and Stevens Analytical Laboratories entered guilty pleas to all ten counts of mail fraud. This admission of guilt effectively ended the legal battle, though the sentencing phase revealed a precarious financial situation for the company. The court considered the company’s finances when determining the appropriate penalty.

Sentencing & Penalties

On September 21, 1992, Alan Stevens received a sentence of six months of home detention coupled with a twelve-month probationary period. Stevens Analytical Laboratories was ordered to pay a $500 special assessment and $4,140.50 in restitution to those impacted by the fraudulent reports. Notably, a fine was *not* imposed on the company, with the judge citing the company’s demonstrated financial hardship as a mitigating factor. While a financial penalty was avoided, the conviction undoubtedly damaged the company’s reputation and ability to operate.

Key Facts

  • Defendant: Stevens Analytical Laboratories, Incorporated & Alan Stevens
  • Crime: Mail Fraud (18 U.S.C. 1341)
  • Location: Stoneham, Massachusetts
  • Date of Charges: March 23, 1992
  • Date of Plea: May 27, 1992
  • Date of Sentencing: September 21, 1992
  • Stevens Sentence: 6 months home detention, 12 months probation
  • Company Penalty: $500 special assessment, $4,140.50 restitution

This case underscores the critical importance of reliable environmental testing and the severe consequences of falsifying data. The EPA’s criminal enforcement efforts in this instance served as a warning to other laboratories and companies that integrity in environmental reporting is not negotiable.


Source: EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Database

Related Federal Cases


Posted

in

by